How AI, Rust, and WebAssembly Are Shaping the Future of Coding

AI in Coding: A Double-Edged Sword

At a recent Red Badger event, our very own Chief Scientist Stu Harris got us thinking about how AI is revolutionising the way we code. It’s like having a super-smart assistant who can automate repetitive tasks, suggest code snippets, and even write entire functions. But it’s not a magic wand. Stu warns that AI can “hallucinate,” generating code that’s almost correct but could lead to significant issues down the line. It’s like having an assistant who’s eager to help but occasionally hands you a wrench when you asked for a screwdriver. The key takeaway? AI can be a powerful tool, but it requires a human touch to guide it and ensure it’s generating reliable code. So, while AI is a game-changer, it’s not a substitute for human expertise.

Why Rust is More Than Just a Programming Language

Rust is gaining traction for good reasons. Stu is a big fan, especially because of its strict compiler. Think of it as a quality control system that doesn’t let any subpar code through. It’s not just about preventing errors; it’s about ensuring that the code, whether human or AI-generated, meets high standards. Rust is also incredibly versatile. From IoT devices to cloud applications, it’s a language that can adapt to various environments. It’s like the Swiss Army knife of programming languages, offering a range of tools to tackle any job. And let’s not forget its sustainability angle; Rust allows for greener, more efficient coding practices, making it a win-win for everyone involved.

WebAssembly: The Unsung Hero

WebAssembly has been quietly revolutionising how we think about web applications. Stu believes it’s time for this technology to step into the spotlight. WebAssembly provides a secure, sandboxed environment for running code, making it a perfect partner for AI-generated code that might need an extra layer of scrutiny. The upcoming WebAssembly component model is particularly exciting. It promises a more unified and secure way to build applications, breaking down the barriers between different programming languages and ecosystems. Imagine a world where you can effortlessly combine components written in different languages into a single, secure application. That’s the promise of WebAssembly.

Crux: The Future in Action

Stu introduced us to Crux, an open-source platform that embodies many of the principles he talked about. Crux aims to streamline the development process, offering an efficient, reliable, and secure way to build and test applications. It’s like having a well-oiled machine where each part works in harmony with the others. Crux is particularly good at testing; it allows for exhaustive end-to-end tests that run in milliseconds, a far cry from the hours-long, flaky tests that many developers dread. With Crux, you’re not just building an app; you’re crafting a masterpiece that stands up to scrutiny.

What About the Next Gen Coders?

A question from the audience brought up an interesting dilemma: Will future coders become too reliant on these advanced tools? Stu acknowledged this as a significant challenge. While these tools can make coding more accessible, they shouldn’t replace the foundational knowledge and problem-solving skills that make a great coder. It’s like learning to cook; even if you have all the latest kitchen gadgets, you still need to understand the basics of flavour, technique, and presentation. Stu’s perspective is that there’s no escape from learning, and that’s a good thing. The tools may change, but the need for human ingenuity remains constant.

Stu’s insights remind us that the future of coding isn’t just about adopting new tools; it’s about using them responsibly and effectively. As we move forward, AI, Rust, and WebAssembly will be invaluable allies, but they’re not a substitute for human expertise and judgement. In essence, with great power comes even greater responsibility. So, as we embrace these new technologies, let’s not forget the human element that makes all innovation possible.